About ORI

News & Events

Research Misconduct

RCR Resources

Programs

Policies & Regulations

Assurance Program

References

Printer FriendlyPrinter Friendly
  • Abbott, A. (2009). Editor retracts sperm-creation paper. Nature, July 30, available at http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090730/full/ news.2009.753.html.
  • Altman D. G., Schulz K. F., & Moher D., for the CONSORT Group (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and Elaboration. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1987-1991. Retrieved August 14th, 2006 from http://www.consort-statement.org/Statement/jama.pdf
  • American Association of University Professors (September/October, 1989). "Statement on Plagiarism." Academe, 75, 5, 47-48.
  • American Medical Writers Association (2008). AMWA code of Ethics, http://www.amwa.org/amwa_ethics.
  • American Psychological Association (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Anastasia, A., Deinhardt, K., Chao, M. V., Will, N. E., Irmady, K., Lee, F. S., Hempstead, B. L., & Bracken C. (2014). Corrigendum: Val66Met polymorphism of BDNF alters prodomain structure to induce neuronal growth cone retraction. Nature Communications 4, 2490, http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140408/ncomms4564/pdf/ncomms4564.pdf
  • Angell, M. and A.S. Relman (1989). Redundant publication. New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 1212-14.
  • Attoui, B., Kherici, N, and Kherici-Bousnoubra, H. (2014). Use of a new method for determining the vulnerability and risk of pollution of major groundwater reservoirs in the region of Annaba–Bouteldja (NE Algeria). Environmental Earth Science, 72(3), 891-903. (Retraction published 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, p. 4396).
  • Beall, J. (2013). Medical Publishing Triage – Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2(2), 47–49.
  • Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003), Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(4), 454-65.
  • Biros, M. H. (2000). Advice to Authors: Getting Published in Academic Emergency Medicine. Retrieved March 6, 2003 from http://www.saem.org/inform/aempub.htm.
  • Bloch J. (2012). Plagiarism, intellectual property and the teaching of L2 writing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Bonnell, D. A., Hafner, J. H., Hersam, M. C., Kotov., N. A., Buriak, J. M., Hammond, P. T., Javey, A., Nordlander, P., Parak, W. J., Schaak, R. E., Wee, A. T., Weiss, P. S., Rogach, A. L., Stevens, M. M., & Willson, C. G. (2012). Recycling is not always good: The Dangers of self-plagiarism. ACS Nano, 6, 1–4.
  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Bright Tunes Music Corp. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd. (1976). 420 F.Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y).
  • Brosgole, L. & Neylon, A. (1973). Kinetic visual imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 423-425.
  • Brosgole, L., & Roig, M. (1983). On the mechanisms underlying kinetic visual imagery: I. The role of eye movements and reafferent stimulation. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7(2), 57-66.
  • Brown, A. S., & Halliday, H. E. (1991). Cryptomnesia and source memory difficulties. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 475–490.
  • Bruton, S. V. (2014). Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research
    misconduct. Accountability in Research, 21, 176-197.
  • Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 432–442.
  • Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors. Nature, May 15, Available at http://www.nature.com/news/physics-paper-sets-record-with-more-than-5-000-authors-1.17567.
  • Clark, J. & Smith, R. (2015). Firm action needed on predatory journals. British Medical Journal, 350, https://nursingeditors.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/bmj-h210-full-1.pdf.
  • Choi, W.-S., Song, S.-W., Ock, S.-M., Kim, C.-M., Lee, J.-B, Chang, W.-J., & Kim, S.-H. (2014). Duplicate publication of articles used in meta-analysis in Korea. SpringerPlus, 3, 182, 1-6.
  • Cooper, C. A. (2008). Reassessing Conference Goals and Outcomes: A Defense of Presenting Similar Papers at Multiple Conferences. PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2), 293-296.
  • Cummings, P., & Rivara, F. P. (2012). Spin and boasting in research articles. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 166, 1099–1100.
  • Dante, E. (2010). The Shadow Scholar. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Available at http://chronicle.com/article/The-Shadow-Scholar/125329/
  • Deckert, G. D. (1993). A pedagogical response to learned plagiarism among tertiarylevel ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 94-104.
  • Dieter, K.C., Hu, B., Knill, D.C., Blake, R. & Tadin, D. (2013). Kinesthesis can make an invisible hand visible. Psychological Science, 23, 1013-1017.
  • Dieter, K.C., Hu, B., Knill, D.C., Blake, R. & Tadin, D. (2014). Corrigendum: Kinesthesis can make an invisible hand visible. Psychological Science, 25(3), 842.
  • Dometrius, N. C. (2008). Academic Double-Dipping: Professional Profit or Loss? PS: Political Science & Politics, 41:2 (April), 289-92
  • Dorland, W. A. N. (2000). Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary, 29th edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
  • Dorland, W. A. N. (2011). Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary. Elevier Saunders.
  • Fang, F. C, Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science U. S. A. 109, 17028–17033.
  • Ferguson, C. (2015). More evidence scientists continue to cite retracted papers, http://retractionwatch.com/2015/02/18/evidence-scientists-continue-cite-retracted-papers/. Accessed July 28th, 2015.
  • Ferguson, C. (2014). Student denied credit, math article retracted. Retraction Watchhttp://retractionwatch.com/2014/10/28/student-denied-credit-math-article-retracted/. Accessed April 10, 2015.
  • Fine, M. A. and Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141-1147.
  • Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writingfor publication. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 440-465.
  • Garner, H. R., McIver, L. J., & Waitzkin, M. B. (2013). Research funding: Same work, twice the money? Nature, 493, 599-601.
  • Gilchrist, A. (1979). The perception of surface blacks and whites. Scientific American, 24, 88-97.
  • Goodman, N. (1998). Paper failed to mention earlier review (letter). British Medical Journal, 317, 884.
  • Halupa, C. & Bolliger, D. U. (2013). Faculty perceptions of student self-plagiarism: An exploratory multi-university study, Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(4), 297-310.
  • Hammond, K. W., Helbig, S. T., Benson, C. C., & Brathwaite-Sketoe, B. M. (2003). Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplications. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 269-273.
  • Harris, B. (2011). Letting go of Little Albert: Disciplinary memory, history, and the uses of myth. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1–17.
  • Heitman, E., and S. Litewka. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology, 29, 104–108.
  • Hexham, I. (1999). The plague of plagiarism. Department of Religious Studies. The University of Calgary. Retrieved March 15, 2003 from http://c.faculty.umkc.edu/cowande/plague.htm#self.
  • Hoffstetter, H. W. (1970), Some observations on phantom visual imagery. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 47, 361-366.
  • Howard, R. M. (1999). The new abolitionism comes to plagiarism. In L. Buranen, L. & M. Roy (Eds.) Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world. N.Y.: State University of New York.
  • Hu, G. (2008). The misleading academic discourse on Chinese-English bilingual education in China. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 195-231.
  • Iverson, C, et al. (2007). American Medical Association Manual of Style. A Guide for Authors and Editors, 10th ed. Oxford. .
  • International Committee of Medial Journal Editors (2014). Uniform Requirements for Manuscript Submitted to Biomedical Journals. http://www.icmje.org/.
  • Jacobs, A. & Wager, E. (2005). European Medical Writers Association (ENWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publication. Current medical Research Opinion, 21, 317-322.
  • Jefferson, T. (1998). Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific Misconduct or necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 135-140.
  • Julliard, K. (1993). Perceptions of plagiarism in the use of other authors' language. Family Medicine. 26, 356–360.
  • Kassirer, J. P. & Angell, M. (1995). Redundant publication: A reminder. The New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 449-450. Retrieved, March 7, 2003 from http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/333/7/449.
  • Katsnelson, A. (2015). Cancer paper pulled due to "identical text" from one published 6 days prior; author objects. Retraction Watch. Available at http://retractionwatch.com/2015/06/12/cancer-paper-pulled-due-to-identical-text-from-one-published-6-days-prior-author-objects/
  • Khaled. K. (2015). The disaster of the impact factor. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1), 139–142.
  • Kim, S. Y, Bae, C-W, Hahm, C. K, & Cho, H. M. (2014). Duplicate publication rate decline in Korean medical journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 29(2), 172-175.
  • Kohler, C. S. (2012). Publications Policy Committee of the American Diabetes Association. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes, 61, 38–39.
  • Kolin, F. C. (2013). Successful Writing at Work, 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.
  • Larivière, V. & Gingras, Y. (2010). On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007). Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 179-190.
  • Levin, J. R. & Marhsall, H. (1993). Publishing in the Journal of Educational Psychology: Reflections at midstream (Editorial). Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 3-6.
  • Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A, Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 326(7400), 1167-1170
  • Logan, T. K., Walker, R., Cole, J., & Leukefeld, C. (2002). Victimization and substance abuse among women: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Review of General Psychology, 6, 325-397.
  • Lundh, A., Sismondo, S., Lexchin, J., Busuioc, O. A., & Bero, L. (2012). Industrysponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database SystematicReviews. 12:MR000033.
  • Lunyak, V., et al., (2002). Corepressor-dependent silencing of chromosomal regions encoding neuronal genes. Science, 298, 1747-1756.
  • Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D.L. & Savvateev (2002). Tolerance of cheating: an analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125-135.
  • Marcus, A. (2010). Redundancy, redux: Anesthesia journal retracts obesity paper in self-plagiarism case. http://retractionwatch.com/2010/08/04/redundancy-redux-anesthesia-journal-retracts-obesity-paper-in-self-plagiarism-case/
  • Marcus, A. (2014). Lack of citation prompts correction in Nature journal. http://retractionwatch.com/2014/04/10/lack-of-citation-prompts-correction-in-nature-journal/
  • Marsh, R. L., & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in apuzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 673–688.
  • Martin, B. (1997). Credit where credit is due. Campus Review, 7, 11. Retrieved February 3rd, 2003 from http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/plagiarismfraud.html.
  • Martini, F. H., & Bartholomew, M. S. (1997). Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738.
  • Master, Z. & Resnik, D. B. (2013). Hype and Public Trust in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 321-335.
  • Mervis, J. (2013). NSF Audit of Successful Proposals Finds Numerous Cases of Alleged Plagiarism. ScienceInsider, March 8th, http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/03/nsf- audit-successful-proposals-finds-numerous-cases-alleged-plagiarism.
  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43, 357–378.
  • McGowan, S. & Lightbody, M. (2008). Enhancing students' understanding of plagiarism within a discipline context. Accounting Education: an international journal, 17, 273-290.
  • Mistiaen, V. (2002). Time and the great healer. The Guardian, November 2. Retrieved February 19th, 2006 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,823114,00.html.
  • Morehead, P. D. (2002). The New American Roget's College Thesaurus in Dictionary Form, 3rd ed., Signet Press: Seattle.
  • Nathan, M. H. (1994). Variations of plagiarism (letter). American Journal of Roentgenology, 163, 727.
  • Ngai, S., Gold, J. L., Gill, S. S., & Rochon, P. A. (2005). Haunted manuscripts: ghost authorship in the medical literature. Accountability in Research, 12, 103-114
  • Office of Research Integrity (1994): Working definition of plagiarism. Office of Research Integrity Newsletter 3(1). http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/misconduct/plagiarism.asp.
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy (1999). Research Misconduct – A New Definition and New Procedures for Federal Research Agencies. Retrieved August 14th, 2006 from http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/misconduct.html.
  • O'Reilly, K. (2013). EHRs: ‘Sloppy and paste' endures despite patient safety risk. American Medical News, February 4, http://www.amednews.com/article/20130204/profession/130209993/2/
  • Paul, D. B. and Blumenthal, A. L. (1989). On the trail of Little Albert. Psychological Record, 39, 547-553.
  • Pechnick, J. A. (2009). A short guide to writing about biology, 7th Edition. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
  • Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism. Open University Press.
  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly 30(2), 201-230.
  • Perkin, M. (1999). References were misinterpreted. British Medical Journal, 318, 1288.
  • Power, L. G. (2009). University students' perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 643-662.
  • Price, A. (2006). Cases of plagiarism handled by the United States Office of Research Integrity 1992-2005. Plagiary: Cross Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 1(1), 1-11. Available at http://www.plagiary.org.
  • Pupovac, V, Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe: An analytical approach based on four studies. Digithumn, 10,14–17, http://www/uoc.edu/digithum/10/dt/eng/pupovac_bilic-zulle_Petrovecki.pdf.
  • Ramirez, M., Dalton, J. T. McMillan, G, Read, M and Seamans, N. H. (2013). Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities? Findings from a 2011 Survey of Academic Publishers" College & Research Libraries 74(4), 368-380. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/marisa_ramirez/25 Resnik, D. B. (2012). Plagiarism: Words and ideas. Accountability in Research, 19, 269–272.
  • Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? The Psychological Record, 47(1), 113-122.
  • Roig, M. (1999). When college students' attempts at paraphrasing become instances of potential plagiarism. Psychological Reports, 84(3), 973-982.
  • Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics and Behavior 11(3), 307–323.
  • Roig, M. (2005). Re-using text from one's own previously published papers: An exploratory study of potential self-plagiarism. Psychological Reports, 97, 43-49
  • Roig, M. (2014). Journal editorials on plagiarism: What is the message? European Science
  • Editing, 40, 58-59.
  • Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179 (6), 1091–1092.
  • Salazar, M. K. (1993). Using the words and works of others: A commentary. Journal of the American Association of Occupational Health, 41, 46-49.
  • Schatz, A. (1993). The true story of the discovery of streptomycin. Actinomycetes, 4, 27- 39.
  • Schein, M. (2001). Redundant publications: From self-plagiarism to "Salami-Slicing". New Surgery, 1, 139-140.
  • Schneider, S. K. & Jacoby, W. G. (2008). Are Repeated Conference Papers Really a Problem? PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2), 307-308.
  • Shafer, S. L. (2011). You will be caught. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 112(3), 491-493.
  • Shahghasemi, E. & Akhavan, M. (2015). Confessions of academic ghost authors: The Iranian experience, SageOpen. Available at http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572262.full-text.pdf+html.
  • Shamoo, A. S. & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Siebers, R. and Holt, S. (2000). Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals (letter). The Lancet, 356, 1445. Retrieved June 15th, 2006 from http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673605740903/fulltext
  • Sigelman, L. (2008). Multiple Presentations of "the Same" Paper: A Skeptical View. PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2), 305-306.
  • Sismondo, S. & Doucet, M. (2010) Publication ethics and the ghost management of medical publication. Bioethics, 24, 273-283.
  • Smolčić, V. S. & Bilić-Zulle, L. (2013). How do we handle self-plagiarism in submitted manuscripts? Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 150–153.
  • Standler, R. B. (2000). Plagiarism in Colleges in USA. Retrieved February 17th, 2003 from http://www.rbs2.com/plag.htm.
  • Steinbok, P. (1995). Ethical considerations relating to writing a medical scientific paper for publication. Child's Nervous System, 11, 323-328.
  • Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., O'Rourke, K., Detsky, A. S. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 101-106. Retrieved June 20th, 2003 from http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/338/2/101.
  • Steneck, N. H. (2000). Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research. In Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity. Office of Research Integrity (pp. 1-16). Retrieved August 14th, 2006 from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~nsteneck/publications/Steneck_N_02.pdf.
  • Swaan, P. W. (2010). Publication ethics--a guide for submitting manuscripts to Pharmaceutical Research. Pharmaceutical research, 27(9), 1757-1758.
  • Swazey, J.P., Anderson, M.S., & Lewis, K.S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 542-553.
  • Tarnow, E., (1999). The Authorship List in Science: Junior Physicists' Perceptions of Who Appears and Why. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5, 73-88, retrieved August 14th, 2006 from http://onlineethics.org/essays/author/authorship.html.
  • Taylor, D. (2002). The appropriate use of references in a scientific paper. Emergency Medicine, 14, 177-170.
  • The PLoS Medicine Editors (2009). Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger. PLoS Medicine, 6(9), http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000156.
  • Tramer, M. R., Reynolds, D. J., Moore, R. A., & McQuay, H. J. (1997). Impact of covert
    duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 635–640.
  • U.S. Copyright Office (September 30, 1996). Copyright law of the United States. Library of Congress, Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, Circular 92.
  • U.S. Public Health Service. (August 8, 1989). Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. 54 Federal Register 151; 42 CRF Part 50, 32446-51. Vasconcelos, S., Leta, J., Costa, L., Pinto, A., & Sorenson, M. (2009). Discussing plagiarism in Latin America. EMBO Reports, 4, 677–682
  • Vasconcelos, S. M. and Roig, M. (2015 in press). Prior publication and redundancy in contemporary science: Are authors and editors at the crossroads? Science and Engineering Ethics.
  • von Elm, E., Poglia, G., Walder, B., & Tramer, M. R. (2004). Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(8), 974–980.
  • Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. Journal of Medical
  • Ethics, 35(6), 348–353.
  • Walker, A. L. (2008). Preventing unintentional plagiarism: A method for strengthening paraphrasing skills. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 35(4), 387-395.
  • Watson, J. B. and Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-14. Retrieved on August 14th, 2006 from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Watson/emotion.htm.
  • Wheeler, A. G. (1989). The pressure to publish promotes disreputable science. The Scientist, 3 (14): 11. Retrieved March 6, 2003 from http://www.the-scientist.com/yr1989/jul/opin_890710.html.
  • Witherspoon, A. (1995). This Pen for Hire. Harper's Magazine, 290, 1741, 49-57.
  • Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335(6068), 542-543.
  • Woloshin, S. and Schwartz, L. M. (2002). Press Releases: Translating Research into News. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2856-2858. Retrieved June 18th, 2003 from http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full//287/21/2856./p>
  • Woolley, K. L. (2006). Goodbye Ghostwriters! How to work ethically and efficiently with professional medical writers. Chest, 130(3), 921-923.
  • World Association of Medical Editors (2005) Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. Available: http://www.wame.org/resources/policies#g​host.
  • Zigmond, M. J. and Fischer, B. A. (2002). Beyond fabrication and plagiarism: The little murders of everyday science. Commentary on "Six Domains of Research Ethics". Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 229-234.