<< Previous Section | < Previous Page | Next Page > | Next Section >> Case: Immunology Graduate Student, Dubious Data Darlene Campion, a PhD candidate in immunology gave her regular presentation of research progress when her PI said that her data looked great and that she should put together an abstract for the spring meeting with herself as first author. After the session Darlene basked in the pleasure of her success. However, nagging doubts about the solidity of her data resurfaced after the next set of experiments. She wanted to do more experiments but the abstract deadline was now only two weeks away and she knew that she would not be able to complete further experiments before the deadline. She went to her PI Gabriella Corral. "Darlene, she was told, you need to go out on a limb a little to be recognized. After all, the system runs on getting credit for doing something first and the innovation can provide recognition for years. Let's put in the abstract and you can keep doing experiments until the meeting. In fact, by then you might have the paper written and submitted. This is a very competitive world, so compete girl, compete!" Darlene, still dubious, sends in the abstract and redoubles her efforts to provide a solid base of experimental evidence to support the novel hypothesis. Meanwhile Dr. Corral heard from the Immunology society that the abstract was selected for a plenary presentation as one of the most significant developments of the year. Elated, she relates the honor to Darlene. Rather than the expected elation, Darlene turns very pale. "As I said before, she states, the data don't seem to be so great to me and I have not been able to substantiate the results." "Well, you still have a little time but if you get no further, we will just present the original material in the abstract," says Dr. Corral. Darlene hurriedly left the room. Questions: Is there any questionable behavior here? Elaborate on the underlying theme in research ethics? What are the options for each of the players if the data remain the same? << Previous Section | < Previous Page | Next Page > | Next Section >> Chapter 1 Quick Links The Ethical Basis of RCRH The Nature of Science Research Integrity Professionalism in Science Practical Elements of Responsible Research Conduct Cases Bibliography Chapter 1 Download (PDF)