Administrators and the Responsible Conduct of Research
Case Study:
The Nancy Ames Case

The Nancy Ames Case

One morning, even before she has finished her first cup of coffee, Nancy Ames glances up from her computer screen to see Lisa Gray, a third year graduate student in Dr. Youngs lab, coming into the office with a very worried expression. Lisa blurts out, "Now Im sure of it! Dr. Young thinks Im a terrible student. Maybe I should just quit grad school!" After asking a few questions, it becomes clear to Ames that the immediate problem has to do with the summary of Lisas annual meeting with her advisory committee.

As departmental secretary, one of Ames responsibilities is to assist the departments graduate program director, Prof. Oldham, with the record keeping associated with the graduate program. The department requires that all graduate students have a meeting with their advisory committee at least once a year. After the meeting, the students advisor is expected to write up a summary for all the participants and for the files on each student that Ames keeps. These files are reviewed annually by the faculty on the graduate program committee to be sure that all grad students are making good progress.

Last week, Ames sent out reminders to students for whom she did not yet have summaries, about half of those in the department, and to their advisors.

Lisa reports that she had met with her advisory committee almost a month ago. So, when she got her reminder, she immediately went to Prof. Youngs office and asked about the summary.

"She said she was busy getting ready for class, and shed talk to me later," said Lisa. "I tried three more times last week, and each time it was 'Ill get to it when I have time, and I have to get to a meeting or something like that. Then the week before that, I tried to talk to her about whether I should move into this cheaper apartment I found about an hour from campus, and she refused to give me any advice. Guess she figures Im not worth her time; that Im just not cut out for grad school!"

Case Discussion
Interests of the Affected Parties
Obligations
Ethical Issues

The principle conflict that Ames finds herself in is a conflict between her responsibilities to the department as a whole as laid out in her job description, and her responsibilities to an individual graduate student. How should she apportion her time and effort? Ames also may feel a desire to deal with Gray quickly so as to get her out of the office, rather than acknowledging her own obligation to address the situation as befits her position in the department. In determining what to do, Ames may experience a conflict between just taking care of everything herself, and acting as is appropriate for a departmental staff member.

Although we don't have enough information to be sure of the situation, Gray may be experiencing a conflict between being loyal to Young, and supporting her own progress in the program by making sure the departmental procedures are followed. Gray may also have a conflict between talking and working with Young, and calling on the support services available to aid her as a graduate student. For Prof. Young, there may be a conflict between Young's interests and obligations as a researcher and faculty member with her interests and obligations as Gray's dissertation advisor.

Consequences of Actions

If Ames does nothing and brushes aside Gray's concerns, it is possible that Gray will become more upset and/or communicate her worries to others in the department. This could result in more distress for Gray and a disruption for the department as a whole. It could also result in other members of the department questioning Ames' effectiveness and result in their losing trust in Ames as an administrator on whom they can rely.

If Ames takes it upon herself to contact Prof. Young and mediate between Young and her graduate student, Gray, it is possible that the situation will have a good resolution, but unlikely. Even so, Ames will most probably have to devote a fair amount of her time to this situation, to the detriment of her other duties. What is more likely is that Gray will be perceived as meddling in an area outside her responsibilities and/or presuming to tell a faculty member what to do. This would not be good for Ames' continued good relationship with members of the department, and so could harm her ability to do her job.

If Ames suggests Gray talk to Young again and then talks to Prof. Oldham if that is not effective, she will be acting within her role as an administrative staff member. It would also be a good idea to let Oldham know about the situation so that he can look into it even if Gray does not contact him. In this way, Ames would be fulfilling her obligation as a staff member who works with Oldham on the graduate program. Depending on the institution, it might also be appropriate for Ames to refer Gray to information on the rights and obligations of faculty and graduate students. It sound like Gray may have some unreasonable expectations of the role Young should play in her life while Gray is in her research group.