There is no one best way to collect data. Different types of research 
          call for different collection techniques. There are, however, four important 
          considerations that apply to all data collection and that will help 
          ensure the overall integrity of both the process and the information 
          collected.
             Appropriate 
          methods. Reliable data are vitally dependent on reliable 
          methods. If you use a test that can detect an effect in one of every 
          100 samples to find an effect that may not occur more frequently than 
          1 in every 1,000 cases, your results will not be reliable. Failure to 
          find the effect could be due to either your experimental design or the 
          lack of an effect, but you will not know which is true. The common saying, 
          “garbage in, garbage out,” applies to research methods.
        Although the need for appropriate methods might seem obvious, studies 
          have suggested that researchers sometimes use inappropriate statistical 
          tests to evaluate their results (see articles by DeMets and Gardner, 
          Additional Reading). Methods can also be compromised by bias—choosing 
          one method or set of experimental conditions so that a particular conclusion 
          can be drawn—or sloppy technique. Whatever the origin, the use 
          of inappropriate methods in research compromises the integrity of research 
          data and should be avoided. Responsible research is research conducted 
          using appropriate, reliable methods.
             Attention 
          to detail. Quality research requires attention to detail. 
          Experiments must be set up properly and the resultsaccurately recorded, 
          interpreted, and published. A failure to pay attention to detail can 
          result in mistakes that will later have to be corrected and reported. 
          Correcting the record takes time and resources that are better spent 
          on the research itself.
        Obviously, it is not possible to avoid all mistakes in research. However, 
          take a look at the errata section of any scientific journal and ask 
          yourself how the mistakes reported could have been avoided. Did the 
          authors check to make sure that each figure was correctly labeled? Were 
          the calculations double checked? Did someone check to make sure the 
          authors were properly listed? Since others rely on their work, researchers 
          have a responsibility to make sure their work is carefully undertaken 
          and reported. Sloppy research wastes funds and should be avoided.
              Authorized. 
          Many types of data collection need to be authorized before they can 
          proceed. Typically permission is needed to use:
        
          - human and animal subjects in research;
 
          - hazardous materials and biological agents;
 
          - information contained in some libraries, databases, and archives;
 
          - information posted on some Web sites;
 
          - published photographs and other published information; and
 
          - other copyrighted or patented processes or materials.
 
        
        Researchers have a responsibility to know when permission is needed 
          to collect or use specific data in their research. If you are not sure 
          whether permission is needed, check before proceeding with data collection.
             Recording. 
          The final step in data collection is the physical process of recording 
          the data in some type of notebook (hard copy), computer file (electronic 
          copy), or other permanent “record” of the work done. The 
          physical formats for recording data vary considerably, from measurements 
          or observations to photographs or interview tapes. However data are 
          recorded, it is important to keep in mind that the purpose of any record 
          is to document what was actually done and the results that were achieved.
        In recording data, keep two simple rules in mind to avoid problems 
          later, should someone ask about or question your work:
        
          - Hard-copy evidence should be entered into a numbered, bound notebook 
            so that there is no question later about the date the experiment was 
            run, the order in which the data were collected, or the results achieved. 
            Do not use loose-leaf notebooks or simply collect pages of evidence 
            in a file. Do not change records in a bound notebook without noting 
            the date and reasons for the change.
 
          - Electronic evidence should be validated in some way to assure that 
            it was actually recorded on a particular date and not changed at some 
            later date. It is easy to change dates on computers and thereby alter 
            the date a particular file seems to have been created. If you collect 
            your data electronically, you must be able to demonstrate that they 
            are valid and have not been changed.
 
        
        As you record your data, it may be helpful to think about them as the 
          legal tender of research—the currency researchers cash in when 
          they apply for grants, publish, are considered for promotion, and enter 
          into business ventures. To have and hold their value, research data 
          must be properly recorded.