Peer Review Quick Guide
***
Common MistakesPrevious MistakeNext MistakePrint This PageExit
***
***
Test Your Knowledge tabUsing Power Analysis to Determine the Appropriate Number of Subjects tab
 
Sample Paper Excerpt

A reviewer is reading over a proposal of a study investigating the outcomes of two different types of substance abuse treatment for people with Psychoactive Substance Use Disorder (PSUD). The research design is a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) where the subjects are randomly assigned to two different treatment conditions. One condition is an innovative type of group therapy; the other group is traditional treatment which will serve as the control condition. The subjects were referred to treatment by the criminal justice system and were long-term addicts strongly habituated to drug use. The new group therapy is designed with consideration given to the unique characteristics of this treatment population. Since their PSUD is severe, the researchers expect a large effect size.

The proposal must include power analysis to determine the appropriate number of subjects to include in each group. Given the novel nature of the research, the researchers found no relevant studies published in the literature that would give them any indication of the size of the effect difference they might find (as measured by pooled variance). The researchers were able to find a study from a parallel literature source whose subjects were all working adults whose treatment was a part of an Employee Assistance Program (EAP). This treatment population is unique because their PSUD was not severe enough to cause them to leave the workforce so the researchers powered the study to detect small effect differences.

The following power statistics based on the study of people with less severe PSUD-that is, the study of subjects enrolled in an EAP-based program

Sample Size of 75 per Group

Pooled Variance:    50     60     70     80     90
Power:                 96.3  92.8   88.7  84.3   79.8

A reviewer reading the proposal has a concern about the power calculation proposed by the authors of the proposal.
 
What is the reviewer's concern?





 
 
***
Finished? View Performance Report

***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***Developed 2006 by the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center, Northern Illinois University.