Peer Review Quick Guide
***
Common MistakesPrevious MistakeNext MistakePrint This PageExit
***
***
Test Your Knowledge tabObjectivity tab
 
Sample Paper Excerpt

A senior researcher with an established reputation in a specialized field is routinely sought after by funding agencies and editorial boards to review proposals and submitted articles. Her current level of demand contrasts sharply with her early professional experience following completion of her doctorate, when the researcher's quest for a research position took almost 1 ½ years. She holds a personal bias against several institutions that chose not to hire her following completion of her doctorate. The researcher has agreed to review a number of proposals for a research funding agency. As she begins reviewing her first proposal, she recognizes that the principal investigator is affiliated with one of the institutions she holds a personal bias against. There is a question as to whether her bias against the institution may also extend to researchers affiliated with this institution.
 
How should the researcher proceed?





 
Proceed to the Next Mistake
 
***
Finished? View Performance Report
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***Developed 2006 by the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center, Northern Illinois University.