Peer Review Quick Guide
Common MistakesPrevious MistakeNext MistakePrint This PageExit
Test Your Knowledge
 
Sample Paper Excerpt
A principal investigator (PI) has completed a limited clinical study examining the efficacy of acupuncture as a treatment for patients recovering from a cerebro-vascular accident. The PI intends to report the study findings by looking at the 1) efficacy of treatment according to severity of condition, 2) treatment objective, 3) specific points, and 4) means or methods of stimulation. The PI anticipates that this study will yield at least four manuscripts, which will be submitted to different journals over the course of two years. The co-principal investigator disagrees about dividing the results, feeling that the neuroscience field would be better served by having the findings reported together in a single article.
 
Which perspective has the preponderance of support?



 
Proceed to the Next Mistake
 
Finished? View Performance ReportPlease add this site to your Trusted Sites, or                                                               temporarily disable any Popup blocker.
Developed 2006 by the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center, Northern Illinois University.