»Resources«
Table of Contents
1: Annotated Primary References
2: Individual Conflicts of Interest
3: Institutional Review Board (IRB) Conflicts of Interest
4: Institutional Conflicts of Interest
5: General List of Conflicts of Interest References
1: Annotated Primary References
Angell M. Is Academic Medicine for Sale? N Engl J Med 2000; 342(20): 1516 - 1518.
-- Academic medicine has become seriously intertwined with the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. In addition, academic institutions have entered into partnerships with drug companies to create research centers. Stronger conflict-of-interest policies are needed, and rules regarding conflicts of commitment should be enforced. Certain financial ties, such as equity interests, should be prohibited altogether. The authors believe that "the incentives of the marketplace should not become woven into the fabric of academic medicine."
Bodenheimer T. Uneasy Alliance -- Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(20): 1539-1544.
-- Without industry funding, important advances in disease prevention and treatment would have been lessened. Companies translate medical advances into treatments for patients, but when results are negative for a company, conflicts may develop. Trials conducted in the commercial sector, such as those by contract-research organizations and site-management organizations, have shifted clinical research into the commercial research networks. In a series of interviews with researchers and pharmaceutical executives, the industry-investigator relationship is analyzed, and includes the topics of trial design, data analysis, publishing results, and the control over publication and authorship.
Cho MK, Billings P. Conflict of Interest and Institutional Review Boards. J Investig Med 1997; 45(4): 154-159.
-- Recent ethically questionable studies have necessitated the examination of the role of the IRB. The IRB was designed to oversee the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects. Both individual and institutional conflicts of interest exist for the IRBs. The authors provide the following suggestions for managing these conflicts: using IRBs that are independent from an institution; increasing community representation and the diversity of professionals that serve on IRBs; increasing accountability through the disclosure of conflicts or financial ties, both individual and institutional; and acknowledging the burden and insufficient resources of IRBs. They conclude that public trust is best maintained by protecting human subjects and avoiding conflicts.
Cho MK, Shohara R, Schissel A, Rennie D. Policies on Faculty Conflicts of Interest at US Universities. JAMA 2000; 284(17): 2203-2208.
-- Evidence exists that financial considerations bias the research record despite federal regulations covering faculty conflicts of interest in federally funded research. This study, a cross-sectional survey and content analysis conducted from August 1998 to February 2000, shows a wide range of approaches to the management of policies concerning faculty conflicts of interest from biomedical institutions in the United States. The authors conclude that this may cause "unnecessary confusion among potential industrial partners or competition among universities for corporate sponsorship that could erode academic standards." Institutions should develop clear and specific policies on conflicts of interest.
DeAngelis CD. Conflict of Interest and the Public Trust [Editorial]. JAMA 2002; 284(7): 2237.
-- "When an investigator has a financial interest in or funding by a company with activities related to his or her research, the research is lower in quality, more likely to favor the sponsorās product, less likely to be published, and more likely to have delayed publication." Safeguards must be developed by institutions to lessen these negative effects. All institutions that accept private funds must develop conflict-of-interest policies for disclosure and oversight; they must continuously monitor the relationships between their faculty and sponsoring companies. "Without [public] trust, research is doomed."
Friedman PJ. The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 413-420.
-- Conflicts of interest have an erosive effect on trust in science, damaging the attitude of the public toward scientists and their research and also weakening the trusting interdependence of scientists. Disclosure is recognized as the key tool for management of conflicts, but rules with sanctions must be improved, new techniques for avoidance of financial conflicts by alternative funding of evaluative research must be sought, and there must be new thinking about institutional conflicts of interest. The research professionās educational role is important, and both the public and research professionals of all ages would benefit from greater understanding of how science should work and does work.
Johns MM, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring Balance to Industry-Academia Relationships in an Era of Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest: Promoting Research While Maintaining Trust. JAMA; 289(6); 741-746.
-- Institutions and institutional decision-makers should fully disclose industry-related financial interests and relationships. Without legitimate justification for such interests, individuals should divest themselves from these interests or recuse themselves from responsibility for research oversight. Management of institutional partnerships might also entail the physical separation of certain facilities; the placement of restrictions on information shared between investment and research staffs; and the provisions of oversight by independent review panels made up of people who have expertise in intellectual property, finance, and research but who are not financially or otherwise dependent on the institution. It is possible to restore balance to industry-academia relationships, thereby promoting progress while maintaining public trust in research.
Martin JB, Reynolds TP. Academic-Industrial Relationships: Opportunities and Pitfalls. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 443-454.
-- Over the past 50 years, academic-industrial collaborations and technology transfer have played an increasingly prominent role in the biomedical sciences. These relationships can speed the delivery of innovative drugs and medical technologies to clinical practice, creating important public-health benefits as well as income for universities and their faculties. At the same time, such relationships raise ethical concerns, particularly when research involves human subjects in clinical trials. Lapses in oversight of industry-sponsored clinical trials at universities, and especially patient deaths in a number of trials, have brought these issues into the public spotlight and have led the federal government to intensify its oversight of clinical research.
Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA Jr., Morse LJ, O'Bannon JM 3rd, Goldrich MS, et al. Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Conduct of Clinical Trials. JAMA 2002; 287(1): 78-84.
-- The interaction between medical research and for-profit corporations has expanded considerably in recent years. A renewed commitment to the application of high ethical standards is essential to ensure that societal trust in research is not eroded, that subjects enrolled in trials do not become merely a means to an end, and that medical research is efficiently translated into clinical advances that will benefit future patients. This article focuses on the analysis of conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials in both academic and community-based settings. It discusses how the roles of research scientists and clinical practitioners differ, and stresses the importance of ensuring that participants' consent to enroll in clinical trials is not the result of confusion about the goals of an experimental treatment that may resemble clinical care. The article also discusses the potential conflicts of interest that can arise when clinicians stand to gain from enrolling their own patients as subjects in clinical trials. This article emphasizes that, in order to preserve the integrity of research and to protect the welfare of human subjects who enroll in trials, physicians should have adequate training in the conduct of research and should be familiar with the ethics of research. Finally, the article addresses disclosure of financial incentives and related funding issues.
Shenk D. Money + Science = Ethics Problems on Campus. The Nation, 22 March 1999.
-- There has been a radical shift in the funding of American science, and this shift has caused concern among university ethicists. There has been a fivefold increase in the amount of private capital spent on university-based science and engineering research between 1977 and 1997. These new alliances have generated a lot of profit, which has both economic and health implications for American consumers. Because universities exist to do research that benefits mankind -- while the goal of companies is to make a profit -- there is concern that the integrity of science is being jeopardized by this different value system. A survey of sponsored academic research found that 58% of companies required investigators to withhold results for more than six months. This secrecy cost dollars and lives. The history of research funding in the US is reviewed, along with a discussion of the Synthroid/Betty Dong controversy.
2: Individual Conflicts of Interest
- American Association of Universities Task Force on Research Accountability.
(2001). Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest. Retrieved 2003 Apr 6, 2003 from http://www.aau.edu
- American Association of UniversitiesTask Force on Research Accountability.
(2001). Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest.
Retrieved 2003 Apr 6, 2003.
- American Medical Association. What you should know about gifts to physicians from industry. American Medical Association 2001. Retrieved 2003 May 28 from http://www.ama-assn.org.
- American Society of Clinical Oncology: Revised Conflict of Interest
Policy [ASCO Special Article]. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2003; 21(12):
2394-2396.
- American Society of Gene Therapy. Policy of The American Society of Gene Therapy on Financial Conflict of Interest in Clinical Research. 2000. Retrieved 2003 May 28 from http://www.asgt.org.
- Association of American Medical Colleges Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting Progress-Policy and Guidelines for the Oversight of Individual Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2002. Retrieved 2003 April 6 from http://www.aamc.org.
- Hasselmo N. Individual and Institutional Conflict of Interest: Policy
Review by Research Universities in the United States. Sci Eng Ethics 2002;
8(3): 421-427.
- Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA Jr., Morse LJ, O'Bannon JM 3rd, Goldrich
MS, et al. Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Conduct of Clinical Trials.
JAMA 2002; 287(1): 78-84.
- Rothman DJ. Medical Professionalism -- Focusing on the Real Issues.
N Engl J Med 2000; 342(17): 1284-1286.
- Steiner D. Competing Interests: The Need to Control Conflict of Interests
in Biomedical Research. Sci Eng Ethics 1996; (4): 457-207.
- Wazana A. Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift? JAMA 2000; 283(3): 373-380.
3: Institutional Review Board (IRB) Conflicts of Interest
- Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Task Force on Financial
Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting Subjects, Preserving
Trust, Promoting Progress II: Principles and Recommendations for Oversight
of an Institution's Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research. Acad
Med 2003; 78(2): 237-245.
- Barnes M, Florencio PS. Financial Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects
Research: The Problem of Institutional Conflicts. J Law Med Ethics 2002;
30(3): 390-402.
- Barnes M, Florencio PS. Investigator, IRB and Institutional Financial
Conflicts in Interest in Human-Subject Research: Past, Present and Future.
Seton Hall Law Rev 2003; 32(3): 525-560.
- Cho MK, Billings P. Conflict of Interest and Institutional Review Boards.
J Investig Med 1997; 45(4): 154-159.
- Groeger JS, Barnes M. Conflict of Interest in Human Subjects Research.
Crit Care Med 2003; 31(3 Supplement): S137-142.
- Johns MM, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring balance to industry-academia
relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest
promoting research while maintaining trust. JAMA 2003;289(6): 741-
746.
- Lemmens T, Freedman B. Ethics Review for Sale? Conflict of Interest
and Commercial Research Review Boards. Milbank Q 2000; 78(4): 547-584,
iii-iv.
- Levinsky NG. Nonfinancial conflicts of interest in research. N Engl
J Med 2002;347(10):759-761.
- Maloney DM. IRBs and Financial Conflict of Interest. Hum Res Rep 2001;
16(11): 3.
- Maloney DM. IRBs and financial conflicts of interest. Hum Res Rep 2002;
17(4):5.
- Maloney DM. IRBs and Their Own Conflicts of Interest. Hum Res Rep 2001;
16(4): 3.
- Maloney DM. Institutional Review Boards Should Not Have Primary Conflict
of Interest Duty. Hum Res Rep 2001; 16(8): 1-2.
- Maloney DM. Institutional Review Boards and Financial Conflict of Interest.
Hum Res Rep 2001; 16(5): 1-2.
- Maloney DM. Financial Conflicts of Interest and Human Subjects Research.
Hum Res Rep 2002; 17(12): 3.
- Maloney DM. IRBs and Institutional Conflict of Interest. Hum Res Rep
2002; 17(11): 3.
- Maloney DM. IRBs and Financial Conflicts of Interest. Hum Res Rep 2002;
17(4): 5.
- Maloney DM. Research Subjects to Be Told About Conflicts of Interest.
Hum Res Rep 2002; 17(2): 3.
- Maloney DM. Institutional Review Boards and Financial Conflicts of Interest.
Hum Res Rep 2002; 17(2): 1-2.
- Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human
Services, Institutional Review Board Guidebook: Chapter 1: Institutional Administration. 1993. Retrieved 14 June 2003 from http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov.
- Pullman D. Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to
Research. J Med Philos 2002; 27(5): 523-545.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators 1998 Update: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved 14 June 2003 from http://www.fda.gov.
4: Institutional Conflicts of Interest
- Is the University-Industrial Complex Out of Control? Nature 2001; 409: 119.
- Correction: In Whose Best Interest? Breaching the Academic-Industrial Wall. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(7): 536.
- American Association of Universities Task Force on Research Accountability. Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest. In: American Association of Universities; 2001.
- Association of American Medical Colleges Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting Progress II: Principles and Recommendations for Oversight of an Institution's Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research. In: 2002.
- Blumenstyk G. Conflict-of-Interest Fears Rise as Universities Chase Industry Support. The Chronicle of Higher Education 1998. May 22, 1998; Sec. A41.
- Coyle SL. Physician-Industry Relations, Part 2: Organizational Issues. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136(5): 403-406.
- Hasselmo N. Individual and Institutional Conflict of Interest: Policy Review by Research Universities in the United States. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 421-427.
- Johns MM, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring balance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest promoting research while maintaining trust. JAMA 2003;289(6): 741-746.
- Martin JB, Kasper DL. In Whose Best Interest? Breaching the Academic-Industrial Wall. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(22): 1646-1649.
- Martin JB, Reynolds TP. Academic-Industrial Relationships: Opportunities and Pitfalls. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3):443-454.
5: General List of Conflicts of Interest References
- Is the University-Industrial Complex Out of Control? Nature 2001; 409:
119.
- Conflict of Interest and Its Significance in Science and Medicine. Proceedings
of an International Conference. Warsaw, Poland, 5-6 April 2002. Sci Eng
Ethics 2002; 8(3): 261-474.
- American Association of Universities Task Force on Research Accountability.
(2001). Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest. Retrieved 2003 Apr 6, 2003 from http://www.aau.edu
- American Society of Gene Therapy. Policy of the American Society of
Gene Therapy on Financial Conflict of Interest in Clinical Research. 2000.
- Angell M. The Pharmaceutical Industry -- To Whom Is It Accountable?
N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1902-1904.
- Angell M. Is Academic Medicine for Sale? N Engl J Med 2000; 342(20):
1516-1518.
- Angell M, Utiger RD, Wood AJJ. Disclosure of Authors' Conflicts of Interest:
A Follow-Up [Correspondence]. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(8): 586-587.
- Association of American Medical Colleges Task Force on Financial Conflicts
of interest in Clinical Research. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: Principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2002. Retrieved 2003 April 6 from http://www.aamc.org.
- Baldwin W. Conference Summary. Conflict of Interest and Its Significance
in Science and Medicine. Warsaw, Poland, 5-6 April 2002. Sci Eng Ethics
2002; 8(3): 469-475.
- Bekelman JE, Li Y. Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest
in Biomedical Research. JAMA 2003; 289(4): 454-465.
- Bird SJ, Spier R. Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1).
- Blumenstyk G. Conflict-of-Interest Fears Rise as Universities Chase
Industry Support. The Chronicle of Higher Education 1998: A41.
- Blumenthal D, Campbell E, Causino N, Louis K. Participation of Life-Science
Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(23):
1734-1739.
- Blumenthal D, Campbell E, Anderson M, Causino N, Louis K. Withholding
Research Results in Academic Life Science. Evidence from a National Survey
of Faculty [Comment]. JAMA 1997; 277(15): 1224-1228.
- Bodenheimer T. Uneasy Alliance -- Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical
Industry. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(20): 1539-1544.
- Boyd E, Bero L. Assessing Faculty Financial Relationships with Industry:
A Case Study. JAMA 2000; 284(17): 2209-2214.
- Bradley SG. Managing Conflicting Interests. In: Magrina FL, editor.
Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases. Washington, DC:
American Society for Microbiology; 2000, pp. 131-157.
- Brown JR. Funding, Objectivity and the Socialization of Medical Research.
Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 295-308.
- Byk C. Conflicts of Interests and Access to Information Resulting from
Biomedical Research: An International Legal Perspective. Sci Eng Ethics
2002; 8(3): 287-290.
- Cho MK, Billings P. Conflict of Interest and Institutional Review Boards.
J Investig Med 1997; 45(4): 154-159.
- Cho MK, Shohara R, Schissel A, Rennie D. Policies on Faculty Conflicts
of Interest at US Universities. JAMA 2000; 284(17): 2203-2208.
- Cho MK. Conflicts of Interest in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Issues
in Clinical Practice and Research. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2002; 13(2): 73-77.
- Choudry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS. Relationships between authors of
clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 2002;287(5):612-617.
- Cohen JJ. Managing Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research.
Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 401-406.
- Council on Governmental Relations. Recognizing and Managing Personal
Conflicts of Interest. 2002.
- Coyle SL. Physician-industry relations, part 1: individual physicians.
Ann Intern Med 2002;136(5):396-402.
- DeAngelis CD. Conflicts of Interest and the Public Trust. JAMA 2000;
284(17): 2237-2238.
- DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A. Reporting financial conflicts
of interest and relationships between investigators and research sponsors.
JAMA. 2001;286(1):89-91.
- Drazen JM. Who Owns the Data in Clinical Trial? Sci Eng Ethics 2002;
8(3): 407-411.
- Edwards SS, Vinicky JK, Orlowski JP. Conflicts of Interest, Conflicting
Interests, and Interesting Conflicts, Part 2. J Clin Ethics 1996; 7(1):
69-76.
- Evans I. Conflict of Interest: The Importance of Potential. Sci Eng
Ethics 2002; 8(3): 393-396.
- Evans GR, Packham DE. Ethical Issues at the University-Industry Interface:
A Way Forward? Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 3-16.
- Fischbach RL. Conflicts of Interest and the Conduct of Clinical Research.
SoCRA Source 2001: 13-16.
- Friedman, PJ. The Troublesome Semantics of Conflict of Interest. Ethics
and Behavior 1992; 2: 245-251.
- Friedman PJ. The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.
Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 413-420.
- Goldner JA. Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research:
IRB Oversight as the Next Best Solution to the Abolitionist Approach.
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2003; 28(4): 379-404.
- Groeger JS, Barnes M. Conflict of interest in human subjects research.
Crit Care Med 2003;31(3 Supplement):S137-S142.
- Hasselmo N. Individual and institutional conflict of interest: policy
review by research universities in the United States. Sci Eng Ethics 2002:
8(3): 421-427.
- Healy D. In the Grip of the Python: Conflicts at the University-Industry
Interface. Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 59-71.
- Hirsch LJ. Conflicts of Interest in Drug Development: The Practices
of Merck & Co., Inc. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 429-442.
- Human D. Conflicts of Interest in Science and Medicine: The Physician's
Perspective. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 273-276.
- Jansen B. Modern Medicine and Biotechnology: An Ethical Conflict of
Interest? Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 319-325.
- Kalichman M. Ethical Decision-Making in Research: Identifying All Competing
Interests. Commentary on "Six Domains of Research Ethics.”
Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(2): 215-218; Discussion 219-222.
- Kassirer JP. Financial Indigestion (A Piece of My Mind). JAMA 2000;
284: 2156- 2157.
- Korn D. Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research [Commentary]. JAMA
2000; 284(17): 2234-2236.
- Lee BM. Good Clinical Practice in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: Comparison
of FDA and HHS Human Subject Protection Regulations. In: U.S. Food and
Drug Administration; 2000.
- Martin JB, Reynolds TP. Academic-Industrial Relationships: Opportunities
and Pitfalls. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 443-454.
- McCrary SV, Anderson CB, Jakovljevic J, Khan T, McCullough LB, Wray
NP, et al. A National Survey of Policies on Disclosure of Conflicts of
Interest in Biomedical Research. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(22): 1621-1626.
- Monbiot G. Guard Dogs of Perception: The Corporate Takeover of Science.
Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 49-57.
- Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FAJ, Morse LJ, O'Bannon J M, Goldrich
M S, et al. Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical
trials. JAMA 2002;287(1):78-84.
- National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research. Conflict
of Interest Information. National Institutes of Health; 2003. Retrieved
2003 April 26 from http://www.nih.gov.
- Olivieri NF. Patients' Health or Company Profits? The Commercialisation
of Academic Research. Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 29-41.
- Orlowski JP, Vinicky JK, Edwards SS. Conflicts of Interest, Conflicting
Interests, and Interesting Conflicts, Part 3. J Clin Ethics 1996; 7(2):
184-186.
- Pallarito K. Families Sue Cancer Center Over Clinical Trial. Reuters
Health 2001.
- Reidenberg MM. Conflict of Interest and Medical Publication. Sci Eng
Ethics 2002; 8(3): 455-457.
- Rhoades LJ. Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of
Research. Sci
- Schieppati A, Perico N, Remuzzi G. Conflict of Interest as Seen from
a Researcher's Perspective. Sci Eng Ethics 2002; 8(3): 337-342.
- Vinicky JK, Edwards SS, Orlowski JP. Conflicts of Interest, Conflicting
Interests, and Interesting Conflicts. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6(4): 358-366.
- Weatherall D. Problems for Biomedical Research at the Academia-Industrial
Interface. Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 43-48.
- Ziman J. The Continuing Need for Disinterested Research. Sci Eng Ethics
2002; 8(3): 397-399.
- Ziman J. Non-Instrumental Roles of Science. Sci Eng Ethics 2003; 9(1): 17-27.
Continue to the next section: → Conclusion