Policies, Reports, and Policy Statements
Association of American Medical Colleges. Guidelines for Dealing with
Faculty Conflicts of Commitment and Conflicts of Interest in Research,
Washington, DC: AAMC, 1990. (PDF)
National Institutes of Health. “Objectivity in Research,”
Federal Register 60, 132 (1995): 35809-35819. (Link)
National Science Foundation. “Investigator Financial Disclosure
Policy,” Federal Register 60, 132 (1995): 35820. (Link)
US Congress. 105th Congress. First Session. Federal Advisory Committee
Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105-153 (1997). (Link)
Office of Management and Budget. Circular A-21, Washington, DC: OMB,
2000. (Link)
Association of American Universities. Report on Individual and Institutional
Financial Conflict of Interest, Washington, DC: AAU, 2001. (PDF)
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance: Financial Disclosure by Clinical
Investigators, Washington, DC: FDA, 2001. (Link)
Office for Human Research Protections. Public Health Service. 2004
Final Guidance: Financial Relationships and Interests in Research Involving
Human Subjects: Guidance for Human Subject Protections, Washington,
DC: OHRP, 2001. (PDF)
Association of American Medical Colleges. Task Force on Financial
Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research Protecting Subjects, Preserving
Trust, Promoting Progress II: Principles and Recommendations for Oversight
of an Institution’s Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research,
Washington, DC: AAMC, 2002. (PDF)
Council on Government Relations. Recognizing and Managing Personal
Conflicts of Interest, Washington, DC: COGR, 2002. (PDF)
Drazen, JM, Curfman, GD. “Financial Associations of Authors,”
The New England Journal of Medicine 346, 24 (2002): 1901-1902. (Link)
Institute of Medicine. National Academies of Science. Study Conduct:
Bias and Conflict of Interest, Washington, DC: IOM, nd.(Link)
General Information Web Sites
Association of American Universities. Conflict of Interest and Misconduct,
nd. (Link)
Association of University Technology Managers. Home Page, nd. (Link)
National Institutes of Health. Office of Extramural Research. Conflict
of Interest, nd. (Link)
Additional Reading
Boyd, EA, Bero, LA. “Assessing Faculty Financial Relationships
With Industry: A Case Study,” Journal of the American Medical
Association 284 (2000): 2209-2214.
Campbell, TID. “Understanding the Potential for Misconduct in
University-industry Relationships: An Empirical Study.” In Perspectives
on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences, edited by John M. Braxton,
259-282. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1999.
Cho, MK, Shohara, R, Schissel, A, Rennie, D. “Policies on Faculty
Conflicts of Interest at US Universities,” Journal of the American
Medical Association 284 (2000): 2203-2208.
Jefferson, T, Smith, R, Yee, Y, Drummond, M, Pratt, M, Gale, R. “Evaluating
the BMJ Guidelines for Economic Submissions: Prospective Audit of Economic
Submissions to BMJ and The Lancet,” Journal of the American Medical
Association 280, 3 (1998): 275-277.
National Institutes of Health. Financial Conflict of Interest and
Research Objectivity: Issues for Investigators and Institutional Review
Boards, Washington, DC: NIH, 2000. (Link)
Shamoo, AE. “Role of Conflict of Interest in Scientific Objectivity:
A Case of a Nobel Prize Work,” Accountability in Research 2, 1
(1992): 55-75.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations.
Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee. Federal
Response to Misconduct in Science, Are Conflicts of Interest Hazardous
to our Health?: Hearing before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government
Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second
session, September 29, 1988, Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1989.