OLAW, USDA, and a voluntary accreditation program (Association for 
          Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care—AAALAC) 
          are charged with or assume the task of assuring that research institutions 
          live up to their responsibilities for the care and use of animals in 
          research.
             OLAW. 
          OLAW relies on an “assurance” mechanism to monitor institutional 
          compliance with the PHS Policy. An “Assurance” is a signed 
          agreement submitted by a research institution confirming that it will:
        
          - comply with applicable rules and policies for animal care and use,
 
          - provide a description of the institution’s program for animal 
            care and use,
 
          - maintain an appropriate IACUC, and
 
          - appoint a responsible IO for compliance.
 
        
        The Assurance is considered the cornerstone of a trust relationship 
          between the institution and the PHS and grantsconsiderable authority 
          to institutions for self-regulation.
        An OLAW-approved Assurance and compliance with PHS policy are considered 
          terms and conditions of receiving PHS funds. Compliance is monitored 
          by OLAW through annual mandatory institutional reporting to OLAW and 
          in the event of noncompliance, serious deviations from the Guide, or 
          IACUC suspensions. OLAW conducts limited site visits and reviews, and 
          if necessary conducts investigations of reported noncompliance. Institutions 
          that fail to submit an Assurance or to live up to the terms of their 
          Assurance can have their approval to use animals in research, teaching, 
          and testing suspended.
             USDA. 
          The animal welfare regulations also have mandatory reporting requirements, 
          but USDA is an inspection-based system carried out by USDA Veterinary 
          Medical Officers. Rather than allowing institutions to “assure” 
          their own compliance, USDA visits sites, either announced or unannounced, 
          to check whether institutions are in compliance. If violations are found, 
          the institution is then subject to administrative fines and penalties.
             Accreditation 
          programs. Animal use programs can be, and most large 
          ones are, accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation 
          of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International. AAALAC is “a 
          private nonprofit organization that promotes the humane treatment of 
          animals in science through a voluntary accreditation program.” 
          It is governed by a Board of Trustees representing scientific, professional, 
          and educational organizations. Its Council on Accreditation is composed 
          of animal care and use professionals and researchers who conduct the 
          program evaluations that determine which institutions are awarded accreditation.
        AAALAC relies on widely accepted guidelines, such asthe Guide, and 
          other peer-reviewed resources when evaluating an institution’s 
          animal research program. During the accreditation process, AAALAC accreditors 
          evaluate all aspects of an institution’s animal research program. 
          If an institution meets AAALAC’s standards, it receives an accreditation 
          for a specified period of time and can use this accreditation to demonstrate 
          its commitment to high standards for the care and use of animals.