As important as rules of the road are for the responsible conduct of
research, they have two important limitations.
First, rules generally
set minimum standards for behavior rather than strive for the ideal.
The rules say that you can drive at 65 miles per hour over a stretch
of road, but there may be times or circumstances when 55 would be better.
If you use human subjects in research, you must follow specific rules,
but there may be situations in which you should strive for a higher
standard of conduct. Responsible research requires more than simply
following rules.
Second, rules will not
resolve some of the personal conflicts and moral dilemmas that arise
in research. Journals have rules against listing undeserving authors
on papers (individuals who have not made significant contributions to
the research described in the paper). These same rules do not tell you
what to do if the undeserving author can have a significant influence
on your career. Rules also cannot replace the critical reasoning skills
needed to assess ethically controversial human or animal experiments
or conflicts of interest. Researchers will face ethical dilemmas in
research. They should be able to recognize these dilemmas and know how
to resolve them (discussed in Chapter 11).
The rules of the road for research therefore need to be supplemented
with good judgment and a strong sense of personal integrity. When meeting
deadlines, you can cut corners by filling in a few missing data points
without actually running the experiments or adding a few references
to your notes that you have not read. You can resist sharing data with
colleagues or leave some information on method out of a publication
to slow down the competition. You can ignore your responsibilities to
students or a mentor in order to get your own work done. You can do
all of these things and more, but should you?
In the final analysis, whatever decision you make when you confront
a difficult decision about responsibility in research, you are the one
who has to live with the consequences of that decision. If you are uncertain
whether a particular course of action is responsible, subject it to
one simple test. Imagine what you are preparing to do will be reported
the next day on the front page of your local newspaper. If you are comfortable
having colleagues, friends, and family know what you did, chances are
you acted responsibly, provided, of course, you also understand your
responsibilities as a researcher, as described in the rules of the road
covered in the rest of the ORI Introduction to RCR.