After completing his term at the National Science Foundation he returned to the university. His goal during that first semester back was to catch up on the literature in his field and prepare a grant proposal. He was pleasantly surprised to find that one of his former graduate students had been hired as an instructor in his department. Shortly after his return he received a request to review a manuscript from a leading journal in his field. In looking over the manuscript, the faculty member noted that its focus was rather tangential to his. Furthermore, he knew that there were probably published papers in the general area that he had not yet read. He considered returning the manuscript to the editor with a note explaining why he was not able to provide the requested review; however, he felt that serving as an external reviewer for this journal would look good for both his annual report and his eventual plans for promotion to full professor, and for the grant proposal he planned to submit.
On reflection he realized that his former
graduate student was much more familiar with the specific issues addressed
in the manuscript that he was asked to review. He rationalized that engaging
her help would benefit both her—by providing professional experience—and
him. She was happy to help out and within a few days provided the faculty
member with a detailed and well thought-out review. She was also very
excited about a specific protocol that the authors in the manuscript had
developed and was anxious to adapt it to her own use. She was unclear,
however, on some of the specifics. Based on the review that the graduate
student had provided, the faculty member was sure the manuscript would
be published, but he also knew that this would be many months from now.
He suggested that the graduate student contact the authors directly to
get the additional information she needed for the protocol.
