Scholarly Misconduct
Misconduct Allegations at UNH: Review Questions
2 of 5
Introduction
Case Studies
Ethical Conduct
Definitions &
Guiding Principles
Misconduct Allegations at UNH
Case Study Reviews
Which one of the following is
NOT
a guiding principle for the UNH Policy on Misconduct in Scholarly Activity?
Actions jeopardizing the reputation of UNH and its scholars are
tolerated in moderation.
Decisions and actions taken during an allegation investigation
should be based on the best and most accurate information and
evidence available
.
Each party involved should have an equal opportunity to present
its case during an investigation of the allegation
.
All information and evidence gathered should be judged
impartially by qualified individuals, with the "preponderance
of the evidence standard" applied as the measure of proof
.
Home
Quit