Several types of activity, both research and non-research,
involving human subjects commonly occur at UNH. In order to clarify whether
or not an activity is research or if human subjects are involved, UNH
employs the federal government's definition of human subjects and research.
Human subjects are defined as:
"Living individual(s) about whom an investigator
(whether professional or student) conducting research obtains: (1) data
through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable
private information."
Research is defined as:
"A systematic investigation designed to develop or
contribute to generalizable knowledge."
To apply the definition of research to an activity, one
must look at the intent of the investigation, the researchers relationship
with the subjects, and the dispensation of the data.
Activities at UNH involving human subjects commonly fall
into the following categories:
Research - the purpose of the activity is to contribute
to generalizable knowledge and data gathered may be shared with a research
community or the public at large.
Evaluation/Assessment/Service/Reporting - the purpose
of these activities is, upon request, to gather data to measure the current
situation in regard to a specific phenomenon or set of factors. Data gathered
may be shared only with the sponsor /client/requesting party and where
appropriate, the faculty advisor, or used for internal decision making
or informational purposes.
Classroom Assignments/Educational Inquiry/Practice - the
purpose of these activities is the education of an individual student
through an inquiry or experiential approach to discover known principles
or phenomena. Data gathered may be shared only with the course instructor
or faculty advisor, or in the case of an internship/practicum, the collaborating
party.
Important: Individuals gathering data from human subjects
as part of evaluations, assessments, service, reporting, classroom assignments,
educational inquiry, or practice abrogate their rights to publish data
as research data; if they choose to share observations with others, their
actions ought to be governed by the ethical standards of their discipline
(e.g. American Psychological Association or American Anthropological Association).
Individuals who wish to gather data from human subjects as part of evaluations,
assessments, service, reporting, classroom assignments, educational inquiry,
or practice AND intend to use the data as research data for the purpose
of publishing or sharing with a research community or the public at large,
must obtain IRB approval PRIOR to conducting the activity.
Activities involving human subjects within the context
of research methods courses normally require some form of IRB review.
Because such courses are designed to lead students to conduct "research,"
it is plausible to assume that such activities be reviewed as research.
Departmental Review Committees (DRC) have been established
to facilitate the IRB's responsibility for protecting human subjects by
reviewing no more than minimal risk research projects generated within
a department. Such authority, when granted, extends only to protocols
classified as EXEMPT under federal regulations. Currently, DRCs exist
in the anthropology, psychology, social work, and sociology departments.
The UNH IRB recognizes that human subjects may be harmed
by unethical or careless activities resulting from evaluations, assessments,
service, reporting, classroom assignments, educational inquiry, or practice.
As a board that values the protection of human subjects and the conduct
of ethical behavior, the board strongly disapproves of such unethical
behavior. However, the IRB recognizes the limits of its mandate and authority.