a) Any person who has reason to suspect that a child has been abused
or neglected must report the information to the New Hampshire Department
of Health and Human Services. RSA § 169-C:29.
b) Any person who has reason to believe that an incapacitated adult is
being or has been subjected to physical abuse, neglect or exploitation,
or is living in hazardous conditions must report the information to the
Director of the Division of Elderly and Adult Services at the New Hampshire
Department of Health and Human Services.
RSA § 161-F:46.
c) Any person who is present or otherwise has direct knowledge of any
student hazing must report the hazing to law enforcement or educational
institution authorities. The educational institution is required to report
the hazing information to law enforcement authorities. RSA § 631:7.
d) Any person who knowingly renders treatment or assistance to an individual
for a gunshot wound or any other injury believed to have been caused by
a criminal act must immediately notify law enforcement officials. (This
reporting requirement does not apply to a victim of sexual assault who
is over 18 years of age, objects to the release of any information, and
has not been treated for a gunshot wound or other serious bodily injury.)
RSA § 631:6.
In addition, in a recent court case, Schneider v. Plymouth State College,
the New Hampshire Supreme Court indicated that employees of New Hampshire
institutions of higher education have a duty to report situations where
there is reason to suspect that a student is being or has been sexually
harassed by a faculty or staff member. The report should be made to appropriate
school officials in accordance with the institution's sexual harassment
policy.
These reporting requirements create a duty of disclosure for faculty
and staff who may obtain certain information during the performance of
their duties or as result of research. Moreover, an employee's failure
to report certain information to law enforcement and/or other third parties,
including administrators at the institution, creates liability issues
for
themselves as well as the institution. Specifically, the institution may
be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the information due to the
fact that one of its employees had actual knowledge. Therefore, it is
important employees understand the reporting requirements and the limitations
on assurances of confidentiality.
(The above information is based on a January 30, 2001 memorandum from
the University System of New Hampshire General Counsel's Office.)
Recommendations for Researchers:
To manage the risk of liability for failure to disclose
any of the above situations by promising confidentiality to human subjects
in a research project where they might reveal the above information, researchers
must ensure participants understand the researcher's reporting responsibilities
and the associated risks they present to participants. Accordingly, when
developing research protocols and accompanying informed consent documents,
esearchers should clearly outline specific situations wherein they are
mandated to disclose certain confidential information (i.e. can not maintain
confidentiality of responses), therefore potentially putting participants
at risk for legal action. Ideally researchers should
present this disclosure information in at least two places in the informed
consent document: (1) detailed as a potential risk to the participant;
and (2) detailed as (a) situation(s) wherein confidentiality of responses
can not be maintained.