Avoiding plagiarism,
self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical
writing
When an investigator’s relationship
to an organization affects, or gives the appearance of affecting, his/her
objectivity in the conduct of scholarly or scientific research, a conflict of
interest is said to occur. The
relationship does not have to be a personal nor a financial one. For example, a conflict of interest could
arise when a family member of a researcher is associated with an organization
whose product the researcher is in the process of evaluating. Does the family member’s association with
the organization compromise his ability to carry out the evaluation
objectively? Let’s consider another
example, imagine an investigator who has been conducting basic science on the
various processes involved in the release of certain neurotransmitters and
whose work has been steadily funded by the maker of one of the most popular
antidepressants. Now imagine a new
situation where the research carried out by that investigator naturally leads
him to study the efficacy of that same antidepressant while being funded by the
company that manufactures it. In conducting the research, is that
investigator’s objectivity affected by his long-standing relationship to the
drug company? Perhaps it hasn’t.
Naturally, some conflicts of interest are unavoidable and having a conflict of interest is not in itself unethical. However, the increasing role industry has played in sponsoring research that bears on commercial applications has led to a focus on how such sponsorship affects the research process and outcomes. The situation appears to be particularly serious in the realm of pharmaceutical research. For example, Stelfox, Chua, O’Rourke, and Detsky (1998) collected a sample of published reports (e.g., studies, letters to the editor) on the safety of calcium channel blockers, drugs used to treat cardiovascular disease and correlated the authors’ conclusions about their efficacy with whether or not the investigators had received financial support from companies that manufacture those types of drugs. The results revealed a strong association between conclusions that were supportive of the drugs and prior financial support from companies that were associated with those types of drugs.
To ameliorate the situation, research institutions, professional societies, and an increasing number of journals have formulated guidelines for dealing with potential conflicts of interest. Essentially, most of these guidelines require authors to disclose such conflicts either in the cover letter to the editor of the journal to which an investigator submits a manuscript and/or in a footnote on the manuscript itself. For additional details consult the various statements listed in the ORI web site (see below)
GUIDELINE 23: Authors
must become aware of possible conflicts of interest in their own research and
to make every effort to disclose those situations (e.g., stock ownership,
consulting agreements to the sponsoring organization) that may pose actual or
potential conflicts of interest.