Peer Review Quick Guide
***
Common MistakesPrevious MistakeNext MistakePrint This PageExit
***
***
Test Your Knowledge tabDisclosure of Conflict of Interest (COI) tab
 
Sample Paper Excerpt

A researcher from an academic institution receives a request by a program officer to participate in a round of reviews for proposals in an area in which she has considerable background. The review process is a single blind review where she will know the name of the authors of the proposals, but the reviewers will remain anonymous to the authors.

The researcher agrees to participate because she feels the opportunity to review proposals will enhance her professional service record. She is given a number of proposals to read, but is assigned to take the lead on reviewing one proposal in particular. As the researcher proceeds with reviewing this assigned proposal, she realizes that she may have a conflict of interests with one of the authors. Earlier in her career, she and the author in question had a mutual affiliation with a research endeavor at a private research lab. There collaborative efforts resulted in several unpublished reports. Since the affiliation was more than five years ago, and the duration of the affiliation was less than nine months, the researcher is uncertain whether she should identify and certify this on the pre-meeting and post-meeting Conflict of Interest Certification forms (COI_Information.pdf, 2005).
 
How should the reviewer proceed with this proposal?





 
Proceed to the Next Mistake
 
***
Finished? View Performance Report
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***Developed 2006 by the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center, Northern Illinois University.