|
|
The future scientist is typically an ardent patriot who is eager
to bring honor to himself and to his country, captivated by
originality, indifferent to material gain and ordinary pleasures,
inclined more toward action than words, and an untiring reader.
In short, he is capable of all sorts of sacrifice to achieve
the noble dream of giving his name to some new star in the firmament
of knowledge. - Santiago Ramon y Cajal
Few [people] are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change. - Robert F. Kennedy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 7: References
and Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monastersky, R. (2005, June 9). Scientific misconduct is rampant, study suggests. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http:chronicle.com/daily/2005/06/20050
Morgan, B., & Korschgen, A. (2001). College Student Journal, 35(3), 418-423.
National Academy of Science. (2000). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Penslar, R. (Ed.). (1995). Research ethics: Cases and materials. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pimple, K. (2003, March). Using case studies in teaching research ethics. Retrieved from http://php.indiana.edu/~pimple/
Pimple, K. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191-205.
Ramon y Cajal, S. (1999). Advice for a young investigator. Translated by N. Swanson & L. Swanson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Research Triangle Institute. (1995). Consequences of whistleblowing for the whistlerblower in misconduct in science cases: Final Report. RTI: Washington, DC.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
This chapter addresses responsibility, guidelines, and protections for reporting violations of responsible conduct of research. Upon your completion of this chapter, we hope that you will understand the responsibility of researchers to both self-regulate and to report ethical violations as well as the procedures and protections for whistle blowing. We also want you to reflect on and commit to the values, scientific integrity, and ethical behaviors required for the responsible conduct of research.
|
|
|
<<
Previous Page |
References Page 5 of 7 |
Next
Page>> |
|