The future scientist is typically an ardent patriot who is eager to bring honor to himself and to his country, captivated by originality, indifferent to material gain and ordinary pleasures, inclined more toward action than words, and an untiring reader. In short, he is capable of all sorts of sacrifice to achieve the noble dream of giving his name to some new star in the firmament of knowledge. - Santiago Ramon y Cajal

Few [people] are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change. - Robert F. Kennedy
Chapter 7: References and Resources
  Gunsalus, C. (1998). How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 51-64.

Gunsalus, C. (1998). Preventing the need for whistleblowing: Practical advice for university administrators. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 75-94.

Hall, K. (2004). Student development and ownership of ethical and professional standards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 383-387.

Harding, T., Carpenter, D., Finelle, C., & Passow, H. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311-324.

Hauptman, R. (2002, November-December). Dishonesty in the academy. Academe, 39-44.

Hawks, V., Benzley, S., & Terry, R. (2004). Establishing ethics in an organization by using principles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 259-267.

Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (1998). Difficulties in understanding reactions to whistleblowing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 25-28.

Iutcovich, J., Kennedy, J., & Levine, F. (2003). Establishing an ethical climate in support of research integrity: Efforts and activities of the American Sociological Association. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 201-205.

Iverson, M, Frankel, M., & Siang, S. (2003). Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 141-158.
Research Ethics
Chapter 7: Serious Science in a Balanced Life
Discussion and Reflection Questions
Integration Questions
References and Resources

This chapter addresses responsibility, guidelines, and protections for reporting violations of responsible conduct of research. Upon your completion of this chapter, we hope that you will understand the responsibility of researchers to both self-regulate and to report ethical violations as well as the procedures and protections for whistle blowing. We also want you to reflect on and commit to the values, scientific integrity, and ethical behaviors required for the responsible conduct of research.

  << Previous Page References Page 3 of 7 Next Page>>