ORI Logo ORI Logo
 
Home About ORI Privacy FOIA Sitemap Contact ORI
. Search ORI
.
.
. Sections
.
.Assurance
.Conferences
.Forensic Tools
.Handling Misconduct
.International
.Policies / Regulations
.Publications
.RCR Education
.Research
.RIOs

.
. Newsletter
.
Latest Newsletter (PDF)
Sept 2009


Past Issues...

.
.
. Annual Report
.
ORI Annual Report 2007
PDF format

Annual Report
Past Reports...

.
. RCR Intro Book
.
ORI Introduction to RCR
RCR Intro Book

.

 
 

 
.
. International Menu
.
.
.Introduction
.Websites
.Activity
.Misconduct Cases

.
.

International - Activity

Wellcome Trust Proposes Research Misconduct Policy

Volume 10, No. 1, December 2001

The Wellcome Trust (WT), Britain's largest biomedical charity, issued new guidelines and procedures for handling allegations of scientific misconduct that are likely to be controversial, since the proposal broadens the definition of misconduct beyond the U.S. Government's current standard, and offers relatively little protection to whistleblowers, according to Science.

The draft guidelines define scientific misconduct as:

fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or deception in proposing, carrying out, or reporting results of research or deliberate, dangerous or negligent deviations from accepted practices in carrying out research. It includes failure to follow established protocols if this failure results in unreasonable risk or harm to humans, other vertebrates, or the environment and facilitating of misconduct in research by collusion in, or concealment of, such actions by others. It also includes intentional, unauthorized use, disclosure, or removal of or damage to research related property of another including apparatus, materials, writings, data, hardware or software or any other substances or devices used in or produced in the conduct of research.

It does not include honest error or honest differences in the design, execution, interpretation or judgment in evaluating research methods or results or misconduct unrelated to the research process. Similarly it does not include poor research unless this encompasses the intention to deceive.
The guidelines would apply only to institutions receiving WT funds. According to Nature, WT funds nearly 20% of Britain's biomedical research, and plans that all institutions receiving its grants adhere to the standards. A WT spokesperson indicated that the final guidelines, set to be issued in the fall of 2002, may include stronger protections for whistleblowers. The United Kingdom has no national body to investigate misconduct cases, and each of the six research councils, which distribute government grant money to researchers, has its own guidelines for universities.


 
.
This page last was updated on January 13, 2005
.
Legal Disclaimer / Accessibility

Adobe Reader icon
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Research Integrity • 1101 Wootton Parkway • Suite 750 • Rockville, MD 20852
  Directions to ORI Office
Questions/suggestions about this web page? Contact ORI
. .