Scholarly Misconduct |  | Misconduct Allegations at UNH: Review Questions | 2 of 5
Introduction Case Studies Ethical Conduct Definitions & Guiding Principles Misconduct Allegations at UNH Case Study Reviews |  |  | Which one of the following is NOT a guiding principle for the UNH Policy on Misconduct in Scholarly Activity? Actions jeopardizing the reputation of UNH and its scholars are tolerated in moderation. Decisions and actions taken during an allegation investigation should be based on the best and most accurate information and evidence available. Each party involved should have an equal opportunity to present its case during an investigation of the allegation. All information and evidence gathered should be judged impartially by qualified individuals, with the "preponderance of the evidence standard" applied as the measure of proof.
Home Quit |  |  |  |  |  |