Scholarly Misconduct |  | Adjust several of the data points... |
|  |  | If he selects this option, the student will have made a conscious decision to falsify data. Falsification is a serious violation of accepted practices in proposing, conducting, or reporting results from scholarly activities and constitutes scholarly misconduct. Accordingly, this is an unacceptable course of action. If he opts to alter the data, the student is ignoring his obligation as a researcher to report data truthfully. Honesty is one of the fundamental values of scholarship. Researchers and scholars must be able to trust that colleagues are honest and truthful in the conduct of their work, such as in reporting and publishing data, as they use this information to replicate work and further develop knowledge about the world in which we live. Falsification, along with other dishonest practices such as fabrication and plagiarism, are damaging to research and scholarly activities because they distort or misrepresent the true results of the activities. Opting to alter the data may be attractive to the student, as he perceives it to be in his best interest. By doing so, he perceives that he can more quickly write the article for which his advisor is pressuring him and thus finish up his graduate studies, permitting him to move on to conduct other more exciting research. However, the student also needs to consider the consequences if he is caught. It is highly probable that, in reviewing the data and documentation with the student, the advisor will discover the falsification. This discovery would lead to allegations of misconduct and perhaps even expulsion from the institution. This would have a severe adverse impact on the student’s career and would also be potentially damaging to the institution, the department, and the discipline.