Peer Review Quick Guide
HomeAboutCommon MistakesDilemmasResourcesFeedbackNIUORIExit
Home > Feedback
Feedback
The purpose of this form is to obtain your feedback on this module and refine it further. The module is intended for self-paced learning by researchers and graduate students in the early stages of their research careers to increase their awareness of Responsible Authorship related issues. Please review the content and activities presented in the module and provide your constructive feedback for the items below.
1. Correctness: The content of the topics presented in the module is accurate.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please explain what can be corrected:
 
2. Coverage: The breadth and depth of coverage of the topics is adequate for the intended purpose.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please explain which topics need more coverage:
 
3. Clarity: The material presented on the topics is clear.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please explain which topics need more clarity:
 
4. Organization: The organization of the material presented in the module is appropriate.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please explain which topics should be organized better:
 
5. Ease of Use: The module with the presented content and activities is easily usable.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please explain the content and activities of which topics are not easy to use:
 
6. Language: The information presented in the module is free of spelling or grammatical errors.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please indicate in which topics the language needs to be corrected:
 
7. Adaptable: The module is adaptable for my teaching and/or research assistant training purposes.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please indicate which topics should be more adaptable:
 
8. Awareness increasing: The module has potential for increasing users' awareness of integrity issues in mentoring/collaboration.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please indicate which topics should be more awareness increasing:
 
9. Engaging: The activities for the suggested topic are engaging to keep the user interested in the topic.
5 (Strongly Agree) 4 3 2 1 (Strongly Disagree)
If selected "1" or "2" above, please indicate which topics should be more engaging:
 
10. Overall rating of the module for meeting the intended objectives.
5 (Excellent) 4 3 2 1 (Poor)
 
Thank you for taking the time to complete the feedback form and providing your valuable input. Please click Submit below to send us your feedback or click Reset to reenter the responses.
 
Developed 2006 by the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center, Northern Illinois University.